When will the parlementaire enquete MH17 start?

Facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedinmailby feather

Many questions about the acting of the Dutch goverment on MH17 remain unanswered in 2014,2015 and 2016. The Dutch goverment has the opinion not to interfere with prosecutor and Dutch Safety Board.

However the behaviour of the goverment is not as it should be. An overview of weird behaviour is here.

In my personal opinion a so called parlementaire enquete is inevitable.

So when will it be held?

As the prosecution will take some years, and the parlementaire enquete cannot be done while the prosecution is still not finished, it will take over 5 years before an enquete can start. It think it will be closer to 10 years.

The enquete into the Bijlmerramp started 6,5 years after the crash of the ELAL aircraft.

 

Facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedinmailby feather

6 Comments on When will the parlementaire enquete MH17 start?

  1. Liane Theuer // March 4, 2016 at 12:28 am // Reply

    Marcel, that it is exactly what they need : time savings.
    You know it, I know it and fortunately a lot of others, too.
    At the moment it’s all about saving the ass of the Ukrainian government.

  2. In the recent debate in the Netherlands where Mr Omtzigt asks the most essential questions about evidence there is mention of Russia having destroyed radar evidence. Russia said repeatedly it had offered this evidence but this was not accepted or needed. So where is the evidence that Russia ever said they destroyed their radar evidence?
    Ukraine does not offer the radar evidence as they are supposed to have switched of their radars at that time, which is, of course, very suspicious and the US has never provided their evidence, which is even more suspicious. Russia says it has images of a BUK being placed close to rebel positions. If true, the old scenario (recently de-classified) of shooting down a passenger plane and blaming teh opposing party might well be true. The extraordinary anti-Putin propaganda is also highly suspicious and without any evidence.
    Must be very hard for the victims’ families to realize that nobody is willing to provide evidence which clearly shows there is a big cover-up going on.

  3. In the recent debate in the Netherlands where Mr Omtzigt asks the most essential questions about evidence there is mention of Russia having destroyed radar evidence. Russia said repeatedly it had offered this evidence but this was not accepted or needed. So where is the evidence that Russia ever said they destroyed their radar evidence?
    Ukraine does not offer the radar evidence as they are supposed to have switched of their radars at that time, which is, of course, very suspicious and the US has never provided their evidence, which is even more suspicious. Russia says it has images of a BUK being placed close to rebel positions. If true, the old scenario (recently de-classified) of shooting down a passenger plane and blaming teh opposing party might well be true. The extraordinary anti-Putin propaganda is also highly suspicious and without any evidence.
    Must be very hard for the victims’ families to realize that nobody is willing to provide evidence which clearly shows there is a big cover-up going on.

  4. In my comment I say “…the old scenario (recently de-classified) of shooting down a plane and blaming the opposing party might well be true.” This refers, for those interested, to the Operation Northwoods and the now declassified document from 1962 where the USA comes up with the following ideas about justifying war with Cuba. Half a century later this could well be implemented during a time of Maidan uprising and CIA’s presence in Kiev. Here are some of the ideas, including the one on what cannot be excluded from what might have happened with MH17 (not a terrible far-fetched scenario):
    Google Operation Northwoods for this information:

    “• Starting rumors about Cuba by using clandestine radios.
    • Staging mock attacks, sabotages and riots at Guantanamo Bay Naval Base and blaming it
    on Cuban forces.
    • Firebombing and sinking an American ship at the Guantanamo Bay American military
    base — reminiscent of the USS Maine incident at Havana in 1898, which started the
    Spanish-American War — or destroy American aircraft and blame it on Cuban forces.
    (The document’s first suggestion regarding the sinking of a U.S. ship is to blow up a
    manned ship and hence would result in U.S. Navy members being killed, with a
    secondary suggestion of possibly using unmanned drones and fake funerals instead.)
    • “Harassment of civil air, attacks on surface shipping and destruction of US military drone
    aircraft by MIG type planes would be useful as complementary actions.”
    • Destroying an unmanned drone masquerading as a commercial aircraft supposedly full of
    “college students off on a holiday”. This proposal was the one supported by the Joint
    Chiefs of Staff.
    • Staging a “terror campaign”, including the “real or simulated” sinking of Cuban refugees ”
    If true, this would explain why, via communication with the US, the Dutch government needs no evidence or do anything other than sit it out for years until all is forgotten or irrelevant as long as sanctions to undermine Putin can be continued and the long standing plans for Syria can continue undisturbed too (and why one is friendly with Turkey in spite of its blatant support of terrorists with whom they collaborate in Syria. Media manipulation is the main weapon!

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published.


*